Leaders of thought
Mechanism for determining leaders
To make it easier to understand the logic of determining opinion leaders, let's simplify the model. Suppose we need to determine opinion leaders for three users A, B and C, using the "Trust Energy" parameter.
Opinion leaders are people who are at the intersection of sets A, B and C.
Leaders are persons who are at the intersection of sets A and B, B and C, A and C
The startup's functionality provides additional functions to leaders according to their "Trust Energy" level. Opinion leaders have the maximum functionality.
Leaders have functionality
"Energy of trust" => 100
The status of a porter. Takes part in disputes. Receives microgrants for production development.
"Energy of trust" => 200
Checking the results of disputes. Receives microgrants for production development. Prioritizes the initiatives of other leaders.
"Trust Energy" => 500
+500 Confidence Energy for your Thought Leaders. Receives grants for the development of his ideas. Sees Top motivational energies.
"Trust Energy" => 1000
+1000 Confidence Energy for your Thought Leaders. Advertising of your initiatives. Receives statistical reporting of all initiatives, disputes, losses of reputations and incentives.
Reputation risks of leaders
When the disputes are closed collectively, he receives "Energy of Trust" for his opinion leaders.
When the dispute is reopened, the steward who participated in closing the previous dispute bears reputational responsibility. Gains 10 🔥 "Trust Energy".
If a dispute arose against him, the arguments of which were recognized as appropriate, then 50 "Trust Energy" are returned to their owners. The sentinel loses his trust rating and the owners will not be able to give him their "Trust Energy" again, but will be able to support him in another way.